I'm sorry you feel that way. I am just reflecting current opinion and discussion. It is up to you what you up-vote and I wouldn't want you to up-vote something you didn't like that would be wrong.
There is much confusion over this so though I would disagree with you on your reasoning you may ultimately be right that it is more of a problem for ETC. Unfortunately the way that the chains divided means large ETH holders are also potentially large ETC holders.
I doubt they would be happy if their ETC just disappeared whether you consider it free money or not.
If it happens who gets the blame and who potentially ends up getting sued? Most likely it will be the ethereum foundation because those who support ETC will blame them creating the split in the first place. Since they have already pushed the argument that hard forks are fine they have painted themselves into a corner. Vitalik's attempts to sit on the fence and be agnostic have not helped.
I'd be interested to know the other "inaccuracies" though. I get the feeling that you are pro HF. That's fine but not everybody is. Without the HF this issue would not exist.
Crazy stuff. There is so much drama around the situation. If both chains survive I think one of them should rebrand so there isn't so much confusion on what is what.