We might have to agree to disagree then @farq, the way I see it is that Bitcoin has had several bubbles along the way, the primary long-term trend is certainly bullish but it's been overvalued a few times and each time was a bubble.
I don't think either of us is "correct" per se, we just have different criteria to evaluate what is a bubble and what is not.
Cheers
well I believe my criteria is more closely aligned to what the word is actually supposed to mean.
good for you @farq. This is your definition:
So I guess your mental image is that of a soap bubble, it inflates, bursts and it's gone forever.
This is the definition of a bubble on Investopedia:
You'll notice there is no mention of the asset becoming "worthless". Bubble=irrational overvaluation of an asset.
The mental image this definition conjures is that of boiling water, it boils and expands, gets agitated then calms... but the underlying asset (water) doesn't get destroyed.
So it's down to definition and again I don't think any of us is "closer to the truth" than the other or "more closely aligned to what the word is supposed to mean". So let's just leave it at that.