I see what you're saying.
What evidence has been brought to the table?
I think it's these murky waters surrounding Pierce that have people scratching their heads and therefore reigniting this conversation.
While Brock Pierce was not convicted there was a $21,000 out of court settlement made by Pierce regarding a lawsuit brought against Rector, Pierce and Chad Shackley by former DEN employees who claimed sexual abuse.
Personally, I would like to hear Brock's side of the story as people often judge others based on the optics of the situation. But the fact that he hasn't, to my knowledge, addressed his involved in DEN and subsequent lawsuits do raise serious questions.
It's an unfortunate situation, as I've heard from people involved in eos that Pierce is a good person who has admiration and respect in the crypto community for his work.
My main point here is that his past, which we only half understand is being used to smear and taint cryptos in general.
If you have the time, have a look at this post from a few months ago by @fortified and also the comments.
He had put out an open letter on the matter, which was linked to in that same article your shared...
I stand corrected. Thank you.
However, the article I linked to you also describes how there's a significant amount of time before a response to the lawsuit is filed and allegations were made, a period of about five months, when he is said to have spent time in Spain with Shackley and was actively trying to get Rector out of prison.
Despite the open letter from 2014, there's still a lot of questions left unaddressed.
Obviously, the ongoing sexual harassment epidemic in Hollywood that's been in the media recently has refocused attention on Mr. Pierce's past.
I'm not saying he's guilty of anything, what I'm saying is that it's entirely appropriate that some of these questions be asked and answered.
There is a video of him on youtube speaking about the issue for about 1 minute.. but it isn't very effective in garnering trust in him:
Thanks, I did see this in another thread after making my comments here and I agree with yo that it's not very effective. Seems like there's likely a gag-order in place regarding the settlement with 'Egan'.
My position currently is that the case made in 'An Open Secret' is pretty strong and Brock's rebuttal is pretty weak. I am also unaware of any reason why he would be targetted for false allegations of this kind as he wasn't involved in any kind of crypto projects back then and their web project was fairly doomed to failure due to technology limits at the time.