My thinking is that if HackerOne works with a coin company that ends up beign a scam or failing for other reasons, their company will be associated with that failure. I can't speak for everyone but personally if that were the case and I ever saw that HackerOne was working with a new ICO, I would assume that to be a scam as well. So, ICOs would choose not to hire HackerOne so as to avoid investors thinking they're just another scam @danile666
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So here is where the misunderstanding about hackerone comes into play. I think ETN just didnt know what they were paying for. Hackerone is really just a platform for freelancers to pentest company sites for bounties. So they put up the bounties, theirs ratings, and everything. I have no real reputation on hackerone, but my making this post kinda ruins any chance of a reputation. The ETN team just needs to step it up, quit blaming others, and get this stuff sorted.