We beg to differ there on both counts, I guess. Maybe you're not doing it 'right'? If we only upvote 'quality' material, would anyone upvote anything? Ever? I mean, seriously, the site has much worse problems than people curating this way. And then curation trails are allowed, are they not? What's that about???
How many photos of someone's dinner do we need to see? Are they quality? Because you'll get enough whales making a fortune off similar such shite material.
Thanks for your input all the same. But if you can't beat them (and you can't), join them?
What's done is done.
If we start changing the rules drastically, people will leave in droves. Driving the price of steem to the ground. And we're all left with nothing.
So whilst, idealistically, I totally agree with what your saying, I can't help but feel we created a bit of a wild west and we're pretty much stuck with it. Those who strongly disagree should probably leave?