You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The cost of negligence

in #curationlast month

A lot I could say about this but without a direction at the authors or posts being curated in what you say is favoritism with content that shouldn't be curated by us compared to others posting in the community would be a good first step to take a look at things rather than beat around the bush and keep talking about everything that's wrong without helping us where to look or what the exact examples are. People can easily create alt accounts as well in case they want to remain anonymous when doing so in fear of getting in someone's "bad list". We'd love to fix what we can but it is difficult to remove the "human" from curation completely, there'll always be some favoritism and friend voting, it's difficult to completely remove that from the curation game but since we reward curators extra to do all these things we'd really want to strive towards the curation being focused on the content, user social activity and engagement towards their posts as those are what's valuable here.

Sort:  

I'm pretty sure people delegating to OCD expect OCD to keep an eye on their curators, not some random users from one of the communities being curated, but okay. I forget most of the times, but a few weeks ago, I started a list anyways. I am running out of space quickly, many posts make the list. Today was a perfect example:




https://peakd.com/hive-193552/@ducecrypto/actifit-ducecrypto-20250125t043403142z https://peakd.com/hive-193552/@drstealth/actifit-drstealth-20250125t065519055z https://peakd.com/hive-193552/@asia-pl/actifit-asia-pl-20250125t155529594z https://peakd.com/hive-193552/@suezoe/actifit-suezoe-20250125t170507798z https://peakd.com/hive-193552/@souta-sw/actifit-souta-sw-20250125t202520725z

No time for more, but I'll try and prepare something later.