You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Some thoughts regarding layer 2 & layer 1 curation

in #curation2 days ago

Not entirely sure what part exactly you're pointing it, I'm guessing automated voting? That's been generally fine, although there was a service that would quite literally pair you up with others just to exchange votes and that's not good. A lot of people hopped on it and later proved to be here for the wrong reasons.

We're all here for rewards and stake, we can't deny that. There's however a difference to how you grow your account and post rewards shouldn't constantly be the same and from the same voters else there's very little point to curaiton to begin with. Everyone could just make a post as a placeholder to distribute inflation with one another while excluding newcomers and those putting in the effort to want some rewards for their time and contributions regardless of their stake and past earnings.

Nothing should be a guarantee is my point, similar to how our posts are earning a fraction of HBD as they did at the top of the market, you shouldn't constantly earn the same amount of HP regardless of what you post. Autovoting is okay in moderation and we definitely need more encouragement for manual voters as that also takes time and effort to make trending and distribution of inflation wider and to more users compared to autovoting without the occasional updates on who's on the receiving end of them.