They also vote with tiny power...like 1% or less.
The point is to get more out of the vote you put in. To them, any curation reward that is equal to or greater than their vote value is a win. This is especially true when their vote is ridiculously tiny.
Money grubbin' idiots, imo.
Well, don't tell them that because I agree. It's not working for them.
Take @tonimontana and @stmdev, for example, they are literally gaining nothing. But, they do prevent other people for gaining meaningful curation. At least, that's what I see from Steem World anyhow.
Maybe that's what they are going for? Sabotaging curation rewards in general?
.
Do they actually not? Ha, didn't know that.
Well, I guess STEEM curation rewards are just collateral damage in this case.
.
Based on my observations:
In most of my posts, I get somewhere between 55-60% of the post value shown after curation.
I would say the impact is significant when it comes to curation returned to the pool. You should do some analysis on that.
.
Yes, numbers would be nice.
Maybe it isn't a big deal.
.
It is an option, they can have it.
Same with early voting, they can have time agnostic voting.
That is my guess.
They are just being dicks.