I am not sure about the curation trail at all, because while some "bigger fish" upvote before you do (when you are a minnow), your share of the curation reward is a bit smaller, because you voted "after" the bigger account. Well, it still can be profitable, I am not saying that it won´t.
But 81% is awesome result if I can say, good job there!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks for your comment, however I dont think you understand what is this about.
I am not asking little fish to join my trial, even though they are welcome to do it.
This is a bot running A.I maximizing MY curation rewards and i am propossing it to the bigger capital.
As i tell @pedrobrito2004 above, i might make a fronter thing where the little fish might benefit.
But for now i am looking to maximize my return and i am not telling anyone lies about joining my trail... I insist if you have MORE SP than me... then you will benefit form trailing me, if you dont it will not be the same results.
Yes I understood badly, now I got it.
Hi @ritxic
At all? What about this solution ...
I'm setting up my own curation trail for project.hope (180k SP). My idea is to create account which would upvote publications that are being shared by our group on telegram (and set up 20% beneficiary to ph-fund). So each of those posts will receive very small upvote already and and next day same post will be upvoted by @project.hope (with it's 180k SP).
This way everyone who visit @project.hope and upvote recent publications (or whoever would follow curation trail) will always upvote "before" that large upvote.
Would that make more sense?
Yours
Piotr
That makes perfect sense, yes.