I agree with this because it would eliminate the voting on posts that people don't actually read.
Thats like agreeing to castration because he peed on the toilet seat.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree with this because it would eliminate the voting on posts that people don't actually read.
Thats like agreeing to castration because he peed on the toilet seat.
It's more like halting rewards for those who are paid to piss on the toilet seat :)
Castration would be removing someone's ability to vote.
Analogy fight! :)
well played
I think you are really mischaracterizing. There really is demonstrable evidence that people are voting on posts without reading them, and the main thing that is incentivizing this is curation rewards.
no, it's not.