@abit, @personz, @clayop and @ned. Any help with getting a tool programmed to locate the posts with the most engagement (comments and eyeball views) would be very helpful for our guild to be optimal and successful.
"Sort by number of views" can only be done by Steemit. "Sort by number of comments" can be done by many 3rd devs, E.G. steemdb.com, steemdata.com, Streemian and etc.
ill point out the same thing i did in the SG post -- it simpply isnt that labor intensive to do it with like normal reading... probably the issue that most requires a tool is the division of labor... that is to say, if the X number of guild members spend a couple hours a day reading and noting the level of engagement, provided there's some way to make sure they are covering different ground from one another, that should be sufficient to see most things.
It would be cool to see more feed options than the ones we have now, such as this, or even more complex kinds of filtering.
I'd consider making this as a standalone tool in the mean time.
While @abit is right, it doesn't make it any more accessible to the average Jo. I'd also disagree with @sigmajin, there's a lot of things we can do manually but there's no reason we shouldn't leverage the available technology to make the process better. The labour intensity scales with the platform and could potentially be prohibitively intensive soon.
"Sort by number of views" can only be done by Steemit. "Sort by number of comments" can be done by many 3rd devs, E.G. steemdb.com, steemdata.com, Streemian and etc.
ill point out the same thing i did in the SG post -- it simpply isnt that labor intensive to do it with like normal reading... probably the issue that most requires a tool is the division of labor... that is to say, if the X number of guild members spend a couple hours a day reading and noting the level of engagement, provided there's some way to make sure they are covering different ground from one another, that should be sufficient to see most things.
It would be cool to see more feed options than the ones we have now, such as this, or even more complex kinds of filtering.
I'd consider making this as a standalone tool in the mean time.
While @abit is right, it doesn't make it any more accessible to the average Jo. I'd also disagree with @sigmajin, there's a lot of things we can do manually but there's no reason we shouldn't leverage the available technology to make the process better. The labour intensity scales with the platform and could potentially be prohibitively intensive soon.