First one seems like a plagiarism. Author's posting frequency suggests, author is posting someone else's work. Moreover, I can' verify the author. Second one, you are just wasting my and your time showing me that link. Idea of this process is for you to prove you can be a quality curator. Submitting posts that don't fit guidelines is a bad idea.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, it was a bad idea, my mistake, I didn't investigate enough.
(as for the second one, I suggested one and only one post to Curie by the discord chat and was really happy to find it (1/1!) and it went through and wanted to share. But I do understand that is not the premise of this post (although you asked for 3 exceptional posts?), didn't know how strict you were - again, didn't do my research, sorry for posting it. I should have treat this post just as if I was to post it there. Also you mentioned you are looking for post what you find exceptional, I have no idea if the second one applies to your taste or if you think if it's curated by curie it has to be good or if the reason you wrote that I waste your time is because you would like to see posts no older than 24 hours. I would appretiate if you could clarify this. Thank you)