How many people would have put money into the DAO had this exploit been known in advance? Few to none. The attacker is exploiting a flaw in the system to undermine the expectations of every DAO participant and even the DAO developers. In my mind that makes him a thief. But at a minimum it makes him highly immoral. The fact that property can sometimes be "legally acquired" (if that's even true in this case) doesn't mean that it's moral to acquire it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: