Review the entire feed on D.Buzz to se what it is about
- And we don't support "stolen" content
We focus on upvoting original.content but we don't censor text, users choose what they see and we have yet to hear from an owner of any content they felt was "stolen" or misused
Posted via D.Buzz
Just the most recent one:
https://hive.blog/hive-174578/@keys-defender/qqetdj
You are pointing me to a blurry image of something that looks like nothing, on the grounds that it proves the image he posted is not his
Where is the original source link from the owner?
Posted via D.Buzz
I’m busy, do your community moderator job and don’t play dumb
Again, you are not speaking professional here and are assuming that I playing dumb.
Posted via D.Buzz
Someone points out to you that someone in your community published someone else's content and got some rewards for it, then after being warned they go on and again publish a dubious painting. I point out that they are still doing it because it's a professional painting including a signature, and you kept defending him. That's why I assumed you were just willing to defend your users without being objective.
No, I didnt still defend him after that.
I also told you that, but it may have got lost in the threads.. again, it's not necessarily the rulings I disagree with but the language you use.
Posted via D.Buzz
I agree it seems like he lied and that he shouldn't he curated.
It might also be good to make a specific Mutelist for people who plagerise content like that.
But replying:
It's unprofessional and gives the appearance of a school yard fight vs. Moderating.
Posted via D.Buzz
covering our eyes does not solve the issue, they still milk the pool
That's not what I said. I said "lies again":