Sorry for vent.
Resteemed your post. 😉Thank-you @davemccoy and when I get better at this computer interaction I will surely have reread this as also others of yours. Since I just keep plugging along trying to get my posts up in a very full day, and reply to replies, and look for newbies, it seems that possibly others do read some of my comments and replies. How do I know¿ Since my disagreement with logic@ about robots, I have increased my followers m, so either my posts are of interest or my position that robots ''just run programs'' and are NOT interlocutors, therefore should not earn the same $ as human members. I don't believe that they should post to Anyone any more than -this is similar content, please explain¿- then the rest of any discussion should be from the 'similar content' postee to the robot's driver and vice versa, in FULL view of the rest of the community,and not of on a side site that who knows if it's public, or viewed or hidden? I have no intention to attempt to go looking for appeal to prove my innocence. The robot driver IS guilty of reducing my reputation, without asking me anything or any discussion. Just arbitrarily not opening any dialogue but copy/paste on every single post of mine since they decided to call me names. Very non-community bias. I do understand that robots are very good at finding similarities, but that is NOT a community judgement against that postee. If some call my excerts spam, they haven't read them. They are excerts. Not whole. They are all from an encyclopedia rotten 'by the people, for the people,' over 85 years ago. They were posted in Remembrance of WW1 veterans who raised me, and not one person who has not liked them has said they have No veterans in their families if a war that us not yet 100 years ago. I'm told the owner of cheetah@ spent over $300 setting that bot up. So what, says I. It found for me a connection that showed me the name and designation of my very old notes I was grateful. The reference it found was from 1884. There is nil plagiarism of an encyclopedia from 134 years ago. That reference is, if one actually reads it, very sus'. The 'gentleman' implies GE wrote or collated it, and dies not mention his spice it his Publisher. The source is the People of the Empire of Great Britain and her territories,who were invited Abd gifted their information to the Publisher Herbert Jenkins Ltd, who by the way, went out of business before WW2., so steemcleaners and cheetah, whomever their drivers are is completely out of line and in my opinion, taking money off steemit under false conditions. I have spent over fifty years fighting bullies, and bullying is the forerunner of terrorism. We, the whole community, need to stop robots being used in a communicative manner within the community of humans. They ate good for what they ate good for, but all ibtercommunicatikn should be by Named people. Hiding, is an attribute if bullies, and therefore terrorism in the making. Innocent until proven guilty, is our way of life. I've invited these drivers of robots to stand forth and write their piece for all to see, but they message me copy/paste daily to go to some other site. I am not a computer trained person at all. I am lucky I had a kid here to set me up on steemit. I am not going away to a hidden agenda to argue. Spam every day on my posts. A robotic moronic post implying I am not worth reading. They are not interlocutors, robots just run programs. If driver of cheetah@ is taking a masters or phd, then they need to learn to communicate like a person. May the blessings be. 😇
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: