- Second, what time do each community member has to analyze the size and the implications of each contribution? Answer: practically zero, just the few seconds each presentation lasts.
I do agree we don't have enough time to evaluation peers contributions. It can be difficult to value someone contributions in a short period of time. Since ƒractally is design in a way that keeps participants independent, anyone can come up with any objective/subjective measure to value his peers. i.e: I can value someone inviting new members more than someone who just started working on code. The randomness of meeting grouping is safety measure in many ways. and the community can always go back and review claimed contributions if needed. ƒractally governance software is going to be opensource and people will be implementing it differently.