So we have the establishment narrative, which is in bad shape.
Too many questions unanswered (or answered with violence), too many credible figureheads breaking ranks and risking it all to speak out.
Too many friends of friends suffering side effects after getting the shot; only to find themselves ignored, wondering how many others aren't being added to the stats.
The counter-narrative has struggled, too.
"Something's wrong" isn't enough; many need a cohesive, self contained alternative before weighing up the possibilities and deciding where they stand.
A vs B is more compelling than A vs not-A.
You find a stranger in your house at 2am, you know there's something amiss; even if you don't know exactly what he's planning.
There are a range of possibilities, none of them good.
So what's the master plan here? The alternative explanation for what we're seeing.
Some people think its a money grab, others that it's a power grab; some think it's incompetence amplified; others that its part of a depopulation agenda.
One big sticking point with the depop theory, is that they'd be murdering or sterilising the obedient, compliant people; leaving the unruly renegades behind and risking retaliation.
The assumption being that if you want power over people, you'd want to remove the people who are difficult to rule, and keep the ones who are easy.
Previous culls have been about getting rid of the intellectual/creative people, to avoid threats; and to keep the hassle-free labourers to work the fields, etc.
What if everything's changed with the profliferation of automation? What if this whole exercise is about being rid of those who are most easily replaced with code/bots?
To have them self select; by issuing a series of commands.
Wear mask,
Social distance,
Scan the code,
Book in for the jab,
Get the jab,
Reschedule,
Get the second,
Get the booster,
Wave your vaxpass, etc
Those who can be most readily replaced by bots (which follow a sequence of instructions); those who see the value they bring to society as their ability and willingness to follow a series of commands, they follow instructions and self select to be removed from the gene pool.
"Just get the shot, it's not that hard"
"If you want to go to the shops, just wear a mask"
"I'm doing what I'm told for the good of society"
"Just accept the program like I have."
The people who are most creative, (those able to imagine and entertain an alternative to a scenario they've been presented); and see their contribution to society being their ability to think differently; they'll smell a rat and decline; keeping themselves and their children in the game, to continue creating, problem solving, and moving humanity forward.
It's a lot easier to train compliance into our inquisitive grandchildren, than to breed intelligence and creativity back into a population which has already been selected for compliance.
Last century, Pol Pot and friends culled the problematic minds and kept the strong bodies; but the creeps at the top now have unlimited cheap labour from machines.
What if this time around they're culling the NPCs and keeping the minds?
Thoughts?
It's definitely a valid hypothesis....
....but how do they avoid the blowback. I'm not just talking about guillotines here, but the whole idea of us even needing a central authority?
If they go the Pol Pot route we end up with poverty and stagnation....but they maintain control. If they go the way you're suggesting they get innovation and progressiveness....but they lose control.
If the psychopaths have a major weakness it's hubris. I think they genuinely don't see (or value) the innovation that can flourish in a free society. Psychopaths crave dominion over others and thrive on control. I can't see them giving that up at any cost.
We don't want to assume it's aggressive. It might be defensive. Between 3D printed firearms, decentralised money and an anticipated deluge of hungry, technologically unemployed people, it might be more about keeping what they have. I've said from the start it feels like a 30 year plan crammed into 3.
I totally agree. The old systems have been breaking down and alternatives are threatening to disrupt their control, and that disruption has been accelerating in recent years.
To me this all looks like a "double down" type of approach, maybe even a pre-emptive strike from the old order. They are going for broke and yes, perhaps cramming 30 years into 3 because the clock is running out on them.....but that just reinforces that this is all about shoring up their control and dominion, not anything that could be remotely considered benevolant or progressive.
Where do I even start?
In the last few years there's been a noticable acceleration in progressive, alternative thinking. Crypto, decentralized networks, alternative ways of living independently and off grid, alternative medicine and holistic approach to life.
No one was falling for the yearly flu scare anymore. More and more people are joining the crypto world. More and more going off line and living their lives.
Lets face it. If they didnt double down now they could have completely lost their grip. Because it was just a matter of time. Even now, said grip is very loose, especially if one considered how many people are actually for, and those against.
I believe there's several stages to this and the ultimate goal is depop. Get rid of a lot now from covid and the vax (but dont tell them it's from the vax and for the love of god, our resources are stretch and theres no way a autopsy is possible ~ so let's just say they died from covid, ok?) Then there's the long game of sterilising the pop (why kill billions of people straight away when you can make money out of all of them before they die anyway?). At the end of it all, not everyone can have kids but they'll still have enough people to harvest and make money from. With enough time and distraction people will forget and gloss over what's happened in 2020 and the people upstairs achieved their goal.
Yeh, this..
But also. If you were a predator, would you hunt down the docile prey, lined up prettily, ready for slaughter or would you go for the one putting up the fight?
Yes:
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
Truth! ⬆️
Bear makes a good point.
In all honesty, I sometimes wonder if we over analyse these things and in reality it's actually incompetence that we are getting from our ruling forces. After all, splitting the atom carried a huge risk of a chain reaction that could destroy the world. They just couldn't be sure, so what did they do? They split the atom.
During the war they trained dolphins to place mines one ships, but didn't take into account that they couldn't tell the difference between enemy and allied ships.
Brother Matt!
As always, I'm late to the party. (Meaning, if you care at all for my eight cents, please reply to this comment and I will upvote your reply at 100%... Heck, please reply anyway!)
Your visit to my blog "reminded me" of your existence, and (wishing to know how you are) I of course visited your blog, only to find this (as always) remarkably insightful entry. Thank You!
You have a particular knack for seeing the (obscured to everyone else) obvious. Your thoughts are more than plausible. One thing that has been weird to me from the beginning of this nonsense is how so many of my highly intelligent friends seem utterly incapable of seeing the big picture, of connecting the dots, of recognizing the vast deception going on. What good is intelligence?
I have, of course, reblogged this very fine article.
3.9 out of four ain't bad at all... While I was initially about to dismiss "incompetence amplified," I have (on second thought) come to agree that is certainly the case among the 'lower echelons' of the PTSB (Powers That Shouldn't Be).
And your spin on depopulation is utterly refreshing. Gives me a touch of hope for myself and my family...
Of course, I know in whom my genuine hope lies; and in his sovereign control. And, Jesus/God bless and help and protect our grandchildren...
Thanks for yet another marvelous insight. You've encouraged me today.
😄😇😉
Feeling's mutual.
It's just getting worse; not here, but in NSW. They've just said in a couple of weeks, all retail staff and customers will need to be jabbed.
Nobody can buy or sell... Why does that sound familiar?
That had me stumped too.
https://peakd.com/covid/@mattclarke/avoiding-the-unthinkable-with-an-each-way-bet
In the future I can see poorer people having to go back to the past, farming and being on farmland again in groups. I think that's how everything is going to turn out. Elites in cities doing whatever and most people will be poor.
Very interesting and thought-provoking stuff here, Matt! :)
I could probably fill a book and fail to explain my 'high-level' views well enough for others to grasp, so I generally don't 'waste my time' typing them out. Suffice to say my views on these matters go a bit deeper, more spiritual, universal, and cyclical-based than most, but aren't completely out of line with what you're suggesting.
Regardless of the vagueness I've offered, I really did enjoy such a provocative read, thanks for sharing, wishing you a great day! 🙏
Very interesting. I think you’re on to something here. They plan to survive and are choosing who they want to share the future with. So happy to hear your in a good place in that equation. 🤙
There is definitely a puppet master pulling the strings on this or puppet master(s). It is not going as originally planned and there are too many intangibles that they can’t control. This is going to end up being a very ugly situation once they lose total control. Which is slipping from their grasps quickly.
Did you hear that they are still doing the virus research over in China (and funded partly by the United States)? I'm not sure how valid it is as I heard it on the radio but if true it leads your theory into some even more disturbing places.
If true it seems to indicate that these lockdowns, curfews, and forced vaccinations are just beginning! An Aussie friend can't even go see his kids across the border because of this.
Congratulations @mattclarke! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Your next payout target is 17000 HP.
The unit is Hive Power equivalent because your rewards can be split into HP and HBD
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out the last post from @hivebuzz:
I would call this a matter of fact. There is no one answer, in the same way as there is no one solution or scenario. The differences in what one thinks, I welcome as positive. It becomes difficult when there should be ONE view and ONE answer, which it won't become. It just won't. Impossible. To want to make it possible, you are ending up in an endless loop of command and conquer.
Anyone who believes himself to be under something or someone in the hierarchy, and who is afraid of this "authority", will go to it in resistance. The doomsday scenarios capture everyone who can watch TV or read. Well, the written word has been around for millennia and television for almost a hundred years. From the richest to the poorest, people fear an uncertain future and watch Netflix & Co. at the same time. The very rich, of course, have very different ways of expressing their fear than the very poor. While some (have to) resign themselves to their fate, others challenge fate, although they also have to resign themselves to it. But they seem not knowing that, HaHa :D.
A Musk, Zuckerberg, Gates or anyone else from this row (known or unknown) may perhaps fear the forces that threaten to break over them from God's ways or nature's ways, in the absence of a human hierarchy above them, while the others perceive the Bergs and Musks and Gates as breaking over them. What they (we/ I) all have in common is their (our, my) fear that our beautiful earth will get rid of humans and that "something has to be done about it". And that's how you do something, isn't it?
So one really cannot speak of an elaborate plan, because in fact no one is able to fix people as "uncreative" or "stupid"-not even "creative" and "intelligent" in space-time, since both creativity and stupidity vary, even in one and the same person. Unless he wishes to create this fixation artificially. Such a forced fixation is usually quite successful, one only has to believe in it firmly enough ;-)
Lockdowns never happened in the way people think of their effectiveness. People break the rules all the times, even without noticing it. But think it successful.
I would like to say goodbye with an image that makes such a fixation vivid: Imagine everything on earth suddenly stopped. Every being - all humans, animals, insects, microbes, plants - would freeze in that very movement that had just been carried out. Even the wind, the water, the ground. That would be a truly successful shutdown, wouldn't it? LOL - as children we used to play "stopp eating" at our birthday-tables. Someone called "Stop!" and you were supposed to freeze, while leading the spoon to your mouth. The one who could hold the position won the game but actually the one who was breaking into laughter first, had exactly the same fun. And all in between, too.
Great analogy. I missed this reply until now for some reason; but absolutely appreciate your input and perspective.
Thank you. Very much appreciated that you came back after such a long time.
Did you browse through your old articles? I do that a lot. The blockchain is great as a storage place for what one was publishing and also what others commented. It's very interesting to go to the very bottom of the blog and have a look at what might have changed since then.
You do not actively blog right now, as I see. I myself also became very inconsistent. Any special reason?
I started, to get my thoughts recorded in case I died young, and my kids wanted to know who their Dad was. They're older now, and know me well.
I also got most of the big stuff I wanted to say, down. I'm working on one at the moment, but its a big 'un. I still upvote and comment, but I'm a reasonably big account, so I'd rather somebody else get the posting rewards (unless I have something I really want to say).
HaHa! :D I often thought that. But then one finds creative ways to repeat oneself ;) But indeed, I couldn't express better what I already expressed here and it would become weaker, or so I suppose (but still, I come back and do it).
Good that your kids grew up and now know you and don't have to rely on written words. They can be deceiving no matter how accurate one thinks one is. LOL
My mom died when I was 46, so a lot of life to get to understand her. She left nothing in terms of writings but she left six children. We are her expression, if you so will (and, of course our fathers) but not solely theirs.
Looking forward to your new post, will hopefully not miss it. ... But then, missing is impossible on the chain. HaHa!! ;)