Well I think its a great idea, why do you think our country has NEVER been directly invaded in the last 100 years, we've only had small skirmishes on our lands and seas by foreign troops (like Pearl Harbour attack), and we retaliated swiftly and strongly after the fact.
I know you can do this, but caring enough to write a detailed walkthrough is just cringe. You're a cringey moron.
Hey, I'm asserting some very clear points, that you have NO idea what you're talking about when it comes to weapons so don't even try to bring it up.
Colonel vindman was on the call, therefore it cannot be second-hand.
Vindman's testimony:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/full-transcript-of-testimony-of-lieutenant-colonel-alexander-s-vindman-white-house-ukraine-expert/6c7d991c-1916-47a2-a320-cfbbea54eb52/
Page 14:
Vindman - "I want the committee to know I am not the whistleblower who brought this issue to the CIA and the committee's attention. I do Not know who the whistleblower is, and I would not feel comfortable to speculate as to the identity of the Whistleblower."
He was listening into the call, and all he said was that he "THOUGHT" that what Trump said was wrong and that he was "concerned by the call", which led to him reporting it as it may affect US-Ukraine's partnership in the longrun, him reporting it was about protecting US interests in Ukraine. The interests that have been expanding before this impeachment ordeal ever took place. (PAGE 17+)
Enjoy this from Tim Pool!
I never made claims of weapon knowledge, I asked where you'd get them from when the government dissolves.
LMFAO TIM POOL HAHAHAHAHAHA YOU'VE COMPLETED THE CHECKLIST FOR BEING A DUMBASS!!!
Thank you for copy/pasting the vindman thing and telling me what I told you while pretending I didn't tell you first. You really are hilarious. This is so epic.
I never made claims of weapon knowledge, I asked where you'd get them from when the government dissolves.
I know, I just want to affirm that point for people; you don't know what you're talking about with weapons and guns. I already have my weapons. So if the government dissolves; I still got my guns and my property.
Tim Pool is actually fairly decent, the fact that you don't like him reveals to me you're heavy on the far left rhetoric and propaganda from leftwing socialists and communists.
Thank you for copy/pasting the vindman thing and telling me what I told you while pretending I didn't tell you first
Yeah, I didn't disagree with you on your point about him being a first-hand witness, I conceded that point to you which is why I didn't make a rebuttal claiming that he wasn't a firsthand witness. You're right, he is a firsthand witness. Congrats... now lets move on, lets talk about the testimony. His actual testimony wasn't substantial, it was his feelings where he FELT like there was a problem with what Trump is doing BECAUSE it affected the YEARS of progress that the intelligence community had in Ukraine. That is what Vindman said. LOL
if the government dissolves, how do you get the tank? That was my question.
Tim pool is a far right propagandist, but okay. You act like "far left" is a bad thing, which is hilarious.
AN ACTUAL CONCESSION AHAHAHAHAHA I WIN!
It wasn't up to him to make a claim as to whether it was impeachable. He was a fact witness. Legality works with fact witnesses answering questions and then congress decides if it's bad. Vindman's feelings literally do not matter at all here. You don't know how litigation works, idiot.
if the government dissolves, how do you get the tank? That was my question.
Hmm, good question. That opens up so many possibilities from physical conflict to local agreements between owners of these weapons and the locals.
Tim Pool is a far right propagandist. LMAOOOOOOOO
This is typical stupidity from the far left who thinks anyone to the right of them is "far right", I'm surprised you're not calling him a nazi and a fascist. I'm far right, I am Libertarian right, he is nothing compared to us. He is centre-left and its very clear by his stances on various issues.
It wasn't up to him to make a claim as to whether it was impeachable. He was a fact witness. Legality works with fact witnesses answering questions and then congress decides if it's bad. Vindman's feelings literally do not matter at all here. You don't know how litigation works, idiot.
Yup, you're right on the first two sentences. However his feelings do matter since his testimony and opening statements, before deeper questions were asked, were primarily about how he felt about the situation. If he didn't FEEL the way he did about what happened, he wouldn't be testifying, and we wouldn't be discussing his testimony but he felt strongly enough to willingly come forward to share his experiences. Like you said, the politicians determine if there was wrongdoing and guess what, the Senate isn't going to support that.
Tim Pool launders Trump and GOP into the cringeosphere of nerdy fashy losers under the guise of "being a lefty from way back!". He's friends with andy ngo who has been proven to author kill lists for neo nazi terror groups.
But okay, I'm over-reacting. Lol.
Libertarianism and anarcho capitalism are almost fake, they make no sense whatsoever. You have no plans to implement your ideology and even if you tried it wouldn't work for 99% of people, including yourself. That is, unless you have 85,000,000 USD equivalents to trade for your meme jet so that you can fly to a private island that was stripped of natural resources 200 years ago to die in a ditch with nothing.
Seriously, it makes no sense. Unless there was miscommunication, care to clarify on discord perhaps?
His feelings are irrelevant. The GOP had fact witnesses that felt the opposite way. News flash: everyone, even diplomats, have feelings.
Vindman's statements PAGE 18-19:
"I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications to the U.S. Government's support of Ukraine. I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Bunisma, it would be interpreted as a bipartisan PIay, which would undoubtedly -- I'm sorry. I'm going to restate that. Sorry. I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Bunisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan p1ay, which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the ca1l, I again reported my concerns to NSC's legal counsel."
Oh no, not Tim Pool....that guy sits on his computer selecting cheap "culture war" stories that he knows will enrage his right-wing fanbase into donating to him. For claiming you're an intelligent journalist, surely you can see that he's a complete grifter.
How come he says he would never vote for Trump or the Republicans, yet only ever shares stories on his channels that praise Trump and dunk on "the left". Riddle me that!
I don't just watch Tim Pool. LOL I watch David Pakman, Joe Roegan, etc etc... he's just one person talking about it, and I think his content is quite fair, not that it is so god damn amazing, but it is fair. He is decent and doesn't generally have bad observations.
I've seen his content and he condemns Trump for a lot of things. I actually watch his videos from start to end, instead of just reacting to thumbnails and his titles. He condemns Trump and makes observations that Trump can be impeached but he makes it clear that the way how Democrats are going about it is just wrong, and I agree with him.