Hmm interesting, I was ranked at 117.68.
I'll agree with some of the feedback here, in that I think intellectual masturbation isn't very accessible to larger audiences. I have some books that are super wordy like this, and everytime I read them, I feel like the author has started down vast meta-tangential ideas, distracting from the point they were originally trying to make.
I think it would be great if this tool took into account ease of comprehension somehow, while still balancing accuracy of assertion. Like, how many readers were actually able to take away something new / valuable / actionable that they hadn't known about before?
Truth brotha.
Agreed, be on the lookout :)