Ahh yes, i am very happy :) a real curation group vote for me.. and they vote for a lot of people... but @cervantes its a real proyect to help people... not a scam to have money and dont vote anybody.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ahh yes, i am very happy :) a real curation group vote for me.. and they vote for a lot of people... but @cervantes its a real proyect to help people... not a scam to have money and dont vote anybody.
@michelcamacaro
i didn't say it was
what i said was, its easy to comment with images how others make money when you get paid with less work.
No dije que era
Lo que dije fue que es fácil comentar con imágenes cómo otros ganan dinero cuando se les paga con menos trabajo.
You are right it is very hard to give yourself votes all day and say that you help a community.
Usted tiene razón, es muy duro darse votos a uno mismo todo el dia y decir que se ayuda a una comunidad.
when you give votes to each other with tens of thousands worth of SP is worse.
cuando se dan votos el uno al otro con decenas de miles de SP es peor
In the same way, I repeat, the value judgment did the author, I do not :)
De Igual manera, le repito, el juicio de valor lo hizo el autor, yo no :)
@michelcamacaro
you do the same but in different way by scale of 100+
haces lo mismo pero de diferente manera por escala de 100+
jajajajaj no nono you are very bad, he is the same person voting for him self... ;P hahahah realy you are funny or are the same author lol...
that is indefensible
@walo, @nnnarvaez, @bebeth and @reveur are acounts of the same person.. you know???
@walo has 1164SP from @nnnarvaez
@reveur has 720SP and is radio project account.
@bebeth has 3400 SP and is a curator project account.
@nnnarvaez has 846 SP main account
is all steem power belonging @nnnarvaez and if he had himself he would make more than having it spread between different accounts like this problem with whats displayed in post is no content and voting.
es todo poder de poder perteneciente a @nnnarvaez y si tuviera él mismo tendría más que tenerlo repartido entre diferentes cuentas como este problema con lo que se muestra en la publicación no hay contenido y votación
add to that the whales behind him, @chitty @austingbank who are unaware that he does not vote for the community that says he votes;)
Because that is the central theme, he asks for help supposedly to support the Spanish-speaking community and uses the power of vote itself ... if he did not say that it is to help anyone, he could do with his sp what he wanted, it is morally wrong to impersonate a curator to gain whale and community sp on his person. this is the scam :)
this is the grafic of a curator?????
http://www.steemreports.com/outgoing-votes-info/?account=bebeth
14 out of 30 votes were to his accounts and all 30 votes were at 100% so 30 votes is only 3 days of voting power in 3 weeks.
his vote is 45c so $4.50 a day 1/2 to him is 2.50 X 3 days= $7.50 in 3 weeks when he could have taken $85.5 more.
If he wanted to take rewards for nothing why didn't he take 19 days of free money?
14 de 30 votos fueron para sus cuentas y los 30 votos fueron al 100%, por lo que 30 votos son solo 3 días de poder de voto en 3 semanas.
su voto es de 45c, por lo que $ 4.50 por día 1/2 para él es 2.50 X 3 días = $ 7.50 en 3 semanas, cuando podría haber tomado $ 85.5 más.
Si quería recibir recompensas por nada, ¿por qué no se tomó 19 días de dinero gratis?
Estoy haciéndome la misma pregunta , haciendo todo un ciclo de auto-voto pero armando critica para vender su "proyecto de ayuda"
Well i am tired for today, to was a pleasure to talk about this, but tomorrow are the long day, you are invite to read about this in a post i am write now, i think tomorrow or the sunday i will up.
Sorry about my bad english :)