We have certain rules in place for the more consistent votes (such as curation reports or curators who happen to be authors who also are underrewarded) to vote them up first between age 12-18h so that our votes won't cause the aforementioned avalanche effect of placing them onto trending hence getting them overrewarded. This has been quite an effective strategy to avoid getting some posts/accounts overrewarded but for our regular curation we don't see a lot of harm in getting our nominations to trending now and then as long as it's unique and often times newer users getting the attention and extra rewards, it just helps distribution and getting a more diverse trending and doesn't occur often.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: