You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Some thoughts on downvotes for adjustment of rewards

in #downvotes2 years ago

It does put me off voting for someone if they never engage. I like those who want to be part of the community and give as well as take. I tend not to give posts that have decent rewards anyway as I can give more support to those who struggle to make much despite having good content. I often say that Hive is not 'fair' as it can be a lot about who you know, but having a lot of voting power brings responsibilities too.

I have done my share of downvoting, but mostly where there's clear abuse of the platform. It does make me some enemies, but so be it.

Sort:  

I'm the same way. Most of my upvotes seem to go towards people who rarely get much more than a buck in rewards. It may not help my curation rewards (then again, it might... I've never really taken the time to learn how to maximize that) but I think it's probably a better use of my upvote to help unrewarded users than add to already decent to great rewards that some others get.

I don't worry too much about what I make from curation. If we can't keep people engaged here then we all lose, so have to play the long game.

That's a great way of looking at it.

I agree! I tend to go half half I suppose ... I'm terrible at maximizing curation rewards but I like to help out underrewarded too as well as good content from people I like x

You can't really maximize them anymore the way you maybe could in previous hardforks, seems a lot of people aren't aware of the recent changes/how it works from what I've been reading lately. Not saying you're not aware but there seems to be many who completely missed how the current linear rewards work.

I probably missed it to. I guess I'm more about making sure others get rewards through my upvotes and comments than worrying about what I get.

Yeah it's a good change all around.