No 1 How important is cleaning up externals to achieve more loyal users on Steem?
The SOS-forums serve extremely well in collecting knowledge and creating ideas. But what comes next? How to come from ideation to action?
This poll helps identify impactful and feasible actions. It is no 1 in a series of 9. By answering these polls you help building a marketing and PR strategy for Steem. For the background please check out this post https://busy.org/@impactn-polls/69mkni-development-of-a-joint-marketing-and-pr-strategy-for-steem-the-polls
Where would you put “cleaning up externals” in this matrix?
What is meant by this? Wikipedia posts and other external presentations of Steem are far from ideal. Let's clean them up.
- A low feasibility high impact
- B medium feasibility high impact
- C high feasibility high impact
- D low feasibility medium impact
- E medium feasibility medium impact
- F high feasibility medium impact
- G low feasibility low impact
- H medium feasibility low impact
- I high feasibility low impact
Answer the question at dpoll.xyz.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for E medium feasibility medium impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Congratulations @impactn-polls! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click here to view your Board
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
IMHO this polls are too complicated or difficult.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
This strategy has a high viability, we have material and human resources, but its impact could be on a half scale, under the premise what is measured can be improved.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for H medium feasibility low impact.
Voted for H medium feasibility low impact.
Voted for H medium feasibility low impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for B medium feasibility high impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
I didn't personally look for third party endorsements of "Steemit" from websites before I got involved. But I can see why this will be important to ensure the messaging is clear and accurate to the wider public, potential new sign ups but also to the press community.
Voted for C high feasibility high impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for I high feasibility low impact.
Voted for E medium feasibility medium impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Congratulations @impactn-polls!
Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade for newcomers in the following category:
I also upvoted your post to increase its reward
If you like my work to promote newcomers and give them more visibility on the Steem blockchain, consider to vote for my witness!
Voted for I high feasibility low impact.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Anything that affects the quality of our platform must be changed, the tools are viable, although the impact will be medium because the context does not act as the main characteristic for the users to be lelaes, in fact there are other communities with There are results that use these external means, but one could start, any percentage of help counts in these moments.
Voted for F high feasibility medium impact.
Voted for B medium feasibility high impact.
Voted for H medium feasibility low impact.
Voted for B medium feasibility high impact.