I’m open to all discussion and was replying to your opinion that this process does not allow the community’s voice to be heard (as the numbers say otherwise) and call be on the accusations of those involved.
I’m sure many conversations happen privately all over discord and Steem, it’s called private messaging. All actions of the working group and Steem Alliance have been done in the open discord server. That is what I was pointing out, and it can be clearly seen for anyone who wants to look.
I do not believe people need to see things the same way as me and actually work pretty hard to ensure all opinions are heard and considered, even if I don’t agree with them. I will most definitely state when something is not factual though, if it pertains to something I’m involved in.. which is what I was doing. Stating your comment was not factual. Then I said you could support it or not, as that is your choice.
Opinions are great and always welcome, opinions based on facts are those that are the most beneficial though, for everyone.
Yes and about you all just put your own proposal together and ignore the rest. I heard about that.
The discussion an opinion bring is what counts not the opinion. All opinions no matter from when where or who they come from should be held equal.
If you cannot see how this opinion came about from the facts I hear about you saying to do your own proposal and skip the nonsense. How the post was published while you had ample opportunity to inform the rest of the community during a show that you had the intention to do so.
That you feel justified to override the community itself says so much. Which is basically what the committee to form a committee has done. not guide the process but be the process.
This again is just opinion. Everything I write is an opinion of mine generally.
Is debate really necessary?
Was it really necessary to attack me in your reply to begin with.
From that point onward it mattered not what you wrote. I held no respect for you from that attack.
I didn’t attack at all, in fact the opposite. There is no “let’s make our own and ignore the rest”, that is a silly statement. I gave input on a proposal, many actually, and have been extremely open about that.
Giving input on a proposal does not mean the others don’t count, as it’s up to the community to decide which idea they prefer, which is the point of this open election.
Even if I decided to make my own completely separate proposal (which I did think about), it still would be up to the community. More proposals give them more options, not less.
So, as I said, your opinion seems to be based on personal frustrations and not any factual events.
The goal here is to build the best foundation possible, with the best ideas brought forward, not to “win”.
More proposals, more collaborations and more ideas mean more options for the community and therefore a better end product.
The community is now giving their consensus on which idea they prefer, nothing more, nothing less.
It’s not pre-decided and there is no cloak and dagger, what you see is what you get.
If you don’t like the process, that’s fair. The volunteer group did their best, maybe it will be a learning experience for the community as a whole.
Have a good day.