It's a distinction that already exists in relevant fields such as law enforcement and actuarial risk assessment. I happened to be aware of it, and so I didn't even really think about the terms in a colloquial sense. No, I don't think it make the comparison pointless. But that's up to the asker, I suppose, or whoever chooses to interpret the poll.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I see your point, and in light of the actual definitions I agree with you that cryptohacking would outpace bank robberies, but bank larceny would dwarf them both.
Original question was badly constructed, I think, since a comparison between cryptohacking and regular bank hacking is much more meaningful.