Without getting into any of the drama, I will say I was never a fan of the dStors model; in which it seemed to just tie shopping to free bid bot votes. The economics and use cases you hint at here and have mentioned since the split are far more compelling. At this point I’m finally interested enough to keep an eye on developments, even if I’m hesitant to support robustly due to the currently nebulous landscape...
I am glad that you are interested. We are going to be working more closely with the community as we go forward from here. dStors will be open source and will be someone of a collborative effort in a sense because we want to shape something that will make the community proud to use while at the same time brings value to the blockchain.
Good to hear. It seems the various elements I was least enthused by have all moved on to the dCommerce side of this recent schism, so it’s giving me a fresh pair of eyes on dStors. Best wishes moving forward and a happy New Year to you!
It looks like the comments I wrote in relation to Bitshares and your commitment to the Steem blockchain ended up surfacing in the form of questions from people like @whatsup.
It might have been good if you resolved & shared my concerns when I first mentioned them instead of dismissing them as an attack @derangedvisions @kaliju @kenmelendez.
That might have prevented some of the commotion since the concerns I mentioned hadn't gone viral yet.
This is eerily similar to the @share2steem breakup, a comparison I also mentioned in the @dstors comment section.
Having said that, 2019 will be a New Year... and I think you guys can still successfully launch @dstors.
All the best to you three @kaliju @derangedvisions @kenmelendez and may good things transpire for @dstors in 2019!
P.S. I love the domain name Dstors.com but I don't think DCommerce.Live is a good domain for DCommerce and that will play to your advantage.