I wouldn't deny the radical nature of the Palestinian society.
You simply stated that since their land has been stolen from them over time, and their area in which to live got smaller, they should stop breeding so much.
"They would import explosives". Well, if they run an independent nation-state like you seem to think is reality, wouldn't that nation-state have the right to?
What administration? Of the PA? That doesn't represent the people of Gaza?
Maybe they don't want to move because they are tied to the land they were born on.
Again, I don't debate that there was a war against Jordan which lead to this.
However, the areas that were supposed to be "left for the Palestinians", has been colonized since the agreement was made after said war.
Israel is run by a far right government who's ideology includes a pure "Jewish State" and has laws on the books that limit the rights of non-Jewish Israelis.
I would. But there is no Palestinian State. There are groups of people living under different degrees of occupation. And revolt would have sense if the group wasn't Muslim, Arab and sold has an "enemy" of the American people.
How is it rational to allow people from New York, France, Eastern Europe and California move to the Middle East, provide them with someone else's land, and think that the people living there (which you tell the world are irrational religious nutjobs) won't get pissed about it?
Especially when the police state you've created around them rivals Germany in 1930.
I guess your argument would be that the Israeli government made a deal with the UN and US-backed Jordan that they have a "right" to the West Bank and Gaza. And because of that, the everyday people there should live under occupation until the whole area to populated with Jews are around the world, and they shouldn't do anything but leave?
What other state on Earth would get this type of rationalization from the liberalized Western world?
It is a cheap argument. I made it to point out your bias on this issue. It's the Arabs responsiblity to NOT act irrationally, even though the side your supporting IS acting irrationally? Is it "good" irrationality though? Do you have this idea about Israeli cultural that it isn't massively racist and that its government deploys a police state? All able to be done because of Western backing?
Your last statement kind of ends this discussion. As you live in a world where the Israeli Government wants "peace and cooperation", not conquest. Which the opposite of what they say and lay out in their policy papers. I mean, AIPAC's push for the Iraq War was of course about "peace and cooperation", not an agreement on water rights in Iraq. The paper "A Clean Break" wasn't written. Laying out plans to destabilize the region and make life unbearable for the Palestinians. These things didn't happen in your world.
Instead, Israel was just trying to create a country in a unpopulated place, and all these racists just hate them for it. Israel can't carry out war crimes, it's defending itself from crazy Muslims.
Israeli politicians target Palestinian children.
A stock photo from Google images.
I wouldn't deny the radical nature of the Palestinian society.
You simply stated that since their land has been stolen from them over time, and their area in which to live got smaller, they should stop breeding so much.
"They would import explosives". Well, if they run an independent nation-state like you seem to think is reality, wouldn't that nation-state have the right to?
What administration? Of the PA? That doesn't represent the people of Gaza?
Maybe they don't want to move because they are tied to the land they were born on.
Again, I don't debate that there was a war against Jordan which lead to this.
However, the areas that were supposed to be "left for the Palestinians", has been colonized since the agreement was made after said war.
Israel is run by a far right government who's ideology includes a pure "Jewish State" and has laws on the books that limit the rights of non-Jewish Israelis.
I would. But there is no Palestinian State. There are groups of people living under different degrees of occupation. And revolt would have sense if the group wasn't Muslim, Arab and sold has an "enemy" of the American people.
How is it rational to allow people from New York, France, Eastern Europe and California move to the Middle East, provide them with someone else's land, and think that the people living there (which you tell the world are irrational religious nutjobs) won't get pissed about it?
Especially when the police state you've created around them rivals Germany in 1930.
I guess your argument would be that the Israeli government made a deal with the UN and US-backed Jordan that they have a "right" to the West Bank and Gaza. And because of that, the everyday people there should live under occupation until the whole area to populated with Jews are around the world, and they shouldn't do anything but leave?
What other state on Earth would get this type of rationalization from the liberalized Western world?
It is a cheap argument. I made it to point out your bias on this issue. It's the Arabs responsiblity to NOT act irrationally, even though the side your supporting IS acting irrationally? Is it "good" irrationality though? Do you have this idea about Israeli cultural that it isn't massively racist and that its government deploys a police state? All able to be done because of Western backing?
Your last statement kind of ends this discussion. As you live in a world where the Israeli Government wants "peace and cooperation", not conquest. Which the opposite of what they say and lay out in their policy papers. I mean, AIPAC's push for the Iraq War was of course about "peace and cooperation", not an agreement on water rights in Iraq. The paper "A Clean Break" wasn't written. Laying out plans to destabilize the region and make life unbearable for the Palestinians. These things didn't happen in your world.
Instead, Israel was just trying to create a country in a unpopulated place, and all these racists just hate them for it. Israel can't carry out war crimes, it's defending itself from crazy Muslims.