6 month ago i had a similar Idea. Because 25% curation is not investor friendly.
But i would go one step ahead. 75% curator 25% author + maybe some author coin.
Because " What is more work?"
Find good content and read allot of shit content to curate or write some content?
Pay as Curator first Money for Steem to give it away for Free and lock it for 13 weeks?
Good Authors get way more money with 25% as now and there get True upvotes not fake.
And Vote Selling would be here but not that much.
Curration is really hart work and you get next to nothing for it. So why a Investor should buy Steem?
The problem is, what will hold people back from using uovote bots and collect 75% curation rewards? You can still cheat the system that way.
Posted using Partiko Android
sure but for now if you curate you get only 25% ( or less). So you have more work and get less.
Thats the problem.
Bot use are always possible. But curating is with 75% not that big ROI waste and good.
Yes i get the point. But in the case of 75% curation rewards using upvote bots will also be that much more profitable.
Sure but the difference is not that huge. The current System is not Investor friendly and makes no Sense.
100 People can write some cooking recipes. But as a User i only want to read the best one.
So the curator should get payed in a perfect Steem world to read all the Shit and reward the best.
With 75% Reward is chance is higher this happens. With 25% it doesnt work as we see now.