Sort:  

A bad but exciting and polarising show gains more popularity than a consistent and good show because there is a lot more to talk about on surface level about the bad polarising show.

Shouwa Genroku Rakugo Shinjuu is the best show since Ping Pong but it's not popular at all. There wasn't much to talk about on the surface level because it was consistent and grounded, but it had a lot of depth, especially in character interactions. An inconsistent and polarising show like Toradora had a lot more going on in surface level and was a much wilder ride than Rakugo, despite being worse.

Go figure why melodrama is popular.

I found both Shouwa Genroku Rakugo Shinjuu and Ping Pong too boring because the stakes were too low. Toradora was boring too, I dropped it halfway since I knew how it would end, the comedy was shit, and it wasn't even grounded like the two above shows so it was impossible to take it seriously, well if nothing else the girls were at least memeable and cute.

Yep Toradora is Boring AF. I personally dropped it at ep 2.

Rakugo has emotional stakes and physical stakes. Ping Pong also has both. The stakes weren't low, that's one of Petros' incorrect talking points.

Petros has also admitted he dislikes sport anime for being about sport.

The opposite problem of not leaving enough lose strands I think is that everything ends up feeling like a Chekov's gun. This is a problem that many mystery novels and dramas/romance suffer from. Like when everything including the characters act in order to keep the plot going forward in the direction that the author wants it breaks the immersion of the reader and ends up feeling like emotional manipulation in dramas and romances especially if they are also tragedies and the author is asking you to feel sorry for the characters. Sometimes some things should be there even if they will have no large significance in the stories of the characters so that the world doesn't feel like a fake-setting built around the characters who themselves feel like puppets of the author. An exception of course could be made in stories like Steins; Gate where everything needs to be(or at least needs to seem like it has been) set around the actions of the characters otherwise it will seem retconned.

but... I am the one talking XD
those are my thoughts

very funny, people want other people to comment, here we go ☺

people comment for people to comment
commentception

Hey snob, my acount has just been aproved and i am glad to help, if this actually helps, but what can u actually buy whit money on this site???
Can u just go to a market and say" Here, bitcoin from steemit, now give me food, u plebs" or smthing, or can u just turn them into money at a bank??
Also, there is a limited number of likes u can do in a day?

A) There is a 21-step way to turn steem into dollars in a bank but you need to wait for a large sum before you do it. Conversion takes a portion.

https://steemit.com/tutorial/@son-of-satire/a-minnows-guide-to-cashing-out-your-steem-sbd-using-paypal-without-using-coinbase-and-their-invasive-identity-checks

B) Every time you press like, you lose 2% of its power. It fills at about 15% every day. It doesn't matter if you do it at once every week (let's say every Friday). Just do it from newer to older, as old threads lose most of the monetization power after a week.

By adding comments I think he means adding the text version of the video because after all, this is a blogging website, so some people might prefer to read rather than watch. On my shit neighbour's internet connection it's hard to get the dtube vids to load tbh.