Wikipedia... anyone can edit and say anything
It is very disturbing to me when avid proponents of the decentralized nature of the Steem blockchain denigrate other decentralized projects like Wikipedia. I have seen this happen over-and-over, though. I really like having a dynamic, up-to-date encyclopedia online rather than having to rely on a centralized, for-profit company like Brittanica or Funk & Wagnalls to publish their once-per-decade hardbound encyclopedia that only contain articles from their "experts" in each field.
I have been a contributing editor at Wikipedia since 2006, and always keep my eye peeled for inaccuracies and make corrections when I am certain I have spotted one. I am very proud of what Wikipedia has built, just as I am proud of what the Steem blockchain has built.
Thanks for the correction. I am sure that if you edit wikipedia with the same passion that you apply on the steem blockchain it is better than I thought.
I didn't mean to strike a nerve with my opinions of wiki. I can remember writing papers in school and the teacher not letting us source wiki because it wasn't widely seen as a real source. Maybe things have changed.
And I apologize if I sounded unnecessarily defensive in my earlier reply. I suppose a 'nerve' was indeed, struck, as I have encountered much ridicule of Wikipedia here on the blockchain, over-and-over from many different people. Yet, there is definitely a similar Modus Operandi in both projects. 🙂