i don't mean to be critical but this is a problem and your answer is not very imaginative. though you have no control over who delegates how much, surely there is a way to influence the economic incentive for extreme domination. just offhand, for example a roof establishing a maximum payout both for dhedge delegations and upvotes for staked dvs. if that example is not a good idea i am certain there are other ways
You're not wrong, also a little busy to put too much imagination into a reply.
Trying to get big players to reduce their delegation doesn't seem very good, I'd rather try and make it better for others to join and fill the void.
A better diversification method needs established for sure. As for upvotes, there's a couple caps built in already, with a little tinkering to reduce abuse, more shares will become available to our target users.
Not ideal, but it's the way everything works everywhere. Look at the top 1% of hive accounts wealth vs everyone else, or any other token.
Unfortunately, delegation diversity is out of my control, and under the control of users like yourself who decide how much gets delegated.
i don't mean to be critical but this is a problem and your answer is not very imaginative. though you have no control over who delegates how much, surely there is a way to influence the economic incentive for extreme domination. just offhand, for example a roof establishing a maximum payout both for dhedge delegations and upvotes for staked dvs. if that example is not a good idea i am certain there are other ways
You're not wrong, also a little busy to put too much imagination into a reply.
Trying to get big players to reduce their delegation doesn't seem very good, I'd rather try and make it better for others to join and fill the void.
A better diversification method needs established for sure. As for upvotes, there's a couple caps built in already, with a little tinkering to reduce abuse, more shares will become available to our target users.