you can't live like that we would have to allow people to steal and kill and that is wrong and immoral. So if you grew some food you get to keep the fruits of your labor nobody should be able to steal it from you.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't think that's necessarily true. What if there wasn't enough land for everyone to grow food? Who gets it then?
are you saying this land is already unowned? if so then first ones to use it and start homesteading would get it, just like in nature first come first serve. There is so much land in just The USA that everyone could be homesteading, the problem is government claim ownership of it all which is illegitimate. Now it may seem like its not "fair" that first to use it gets it but its what is moral, if he used that land first to grow food for himself then it would be wrong of you to chase him away and take it or just take some food from it.
That doesn't work for me in a world with an ever-increasing population and need to keep some areas without permanent human settlement. That doesn't really hold space for the next 7 generations.
The world can hold a lot of people.
As long as they are earth stewards and work in harmony with the ecosystem... yes. That is not currently the majority nor anywhere close, unfortunately. So the earth's capacity largely relies on the practices of the people who would decide they own it.
yeah, but those people that own the land have to provide for other's to get what they need and if the majority of people on earth want to help the planet then they would not give money to those that harm it.