I agree with dan above but have to say that the article makes a lot more sense from an economical standpoint than a general philosophical one.
He assumes that "cause and effect are not subjective whatsoever, and to the contrary, are mathematically absolute," and that sounds hilarious at first, but maybe this article is meant to be more practical.
Judging by the responses below the article you are not alone in that thought. ;)
I agree with dan above but have to say that the article makes a lot more sense from an economical standpoint than a general philosophical one.
He assumes that "cause and effect are not subjective whatsoever, and to the contrary, are mathematically absolute," and that sounds hilarious at first, but maybe this article is meant to be more practical.