I'm curious to hear why you aren't a fan of L. Zhang. I see her data as invaluable, and her analyses seem spot on. Interbank lending seems pretty prophetic. I reckon raising interest rates is intended to trigger collapse, by making the deficits the US has been generating unpayable, and terminating interbank lending seems designed to augment this by promoting runs on banks.
I'd appreciate your thoughts. I do count on contrarian views, and yours seems to be one.
Debt has always been the ultimate evil control mechanism in society. I was always taught as a youngster never to get into debt. I use it very sparingly now. I think it was good advice.
People may think that they are living the high life living credit funded lifestyles, but it always has to be paid for one way or another.
I still don't get why Lynette is such a gold fan vs. silver. Every time that I hear her make a recommendation it appears to be gold. This makes no sense to me. Clearly (and for a hell of a lot of reasons) silver is a far greater opportunity. If gold takes off, it's impossible that silver won't take off as well.
I think Lynette and others like her use gold because of what it stands for. That is gold (and silver) in the basket of precious metals. Which could also include platnum and paladium BTW.
True, it could be. I just find it strange that she never really calls it out though. In addition, she also talks specifically about the gold she's buying and not silver.
I don't blame the banks for not trusting each other...I don't trust them either!! haha. For real tho, the current banking system has been sick and corrupt for a while now, for some reason most folks can't seem to see it. For a while I have been getting my metals and the strategy is HOLD HOLD HOLD. I will not sell it for crypto...nice try banksters. I suppose I'm 30 years away from retirement so I have time to wait for the manipulation to be over. That being said I also recognized the important role that crypto will have in the future and will gain in popularity. Holding some of both is probably a good strategy. It's just a matter of time until the current system falls apart and everyone rushes for the exit door both into metals and cryptos, anything they can get their hands on. The one thing I would like to point out, there is only so much physical supply of pm's available when that happens.
When the SHTF I think Gold will be a better asset to have instead of Cryptos. When you will have to go to your local supplier for whatever you will need at the time, most likely food, you will have a better chance at trading value with precious metals and a firm hand shake.
'Cryptos? What's a f-ing crypto? Look you want these tomato or not? Cause there are people behind you, so get out of the way.'
You'd be better off with useless dollars, at least he'll be able to start a five with them for his wood stove.
I agree with you 100% , metals will be more recognized at first, at the end of the day crypto is much like fiat, it's value is based on consumer confidence but reality is, there wont be enough metals to go around and ppl running for the exit doors will have to take whatever other currency is available. In the past, it was possible to put your money in a different country's economy because they didn't all falter at once but this time, all the economies are interdependent and they will all start to collapse one by one and all fiat systems will be dragged down. When it comes to international settlements traveling or making purchases abroad, a backpack full of gold or silver will be kind of inconvenient where that will also open the door for crypto currencies along with the permanent recording it provides. If adopted by governments it would also help protect against tax evasion scams because of it's transparency, the blockchain isn't as anonymous as everyone seems to think, it only is for the time being because it is ignored by governments for the most part. I could see a precious metal or other resource backed crypto currency becoming the new standard. At the end of the day, precious metals still win and will gain massive value if it ever comes to such a scenario.
we have not run out but in today's age there is less than 1 % of the population that hold, most of us holders have more than 1 oz and we will not give them up so easily. There will be enough to back a currency with it by increasing it's physical value for sure but there wont be enough for all of the population to trade with daily or convert their current cash holdings into it in a short period of time.
You need to get out of the mindset we have here today. We donnot have a free market system. In a truely free market it will be hard to run out of almost anything because the laws of supply and demand takes care of that. So in a free market you will not run out of gold it will simply be priced accordingly. You have silver, platnum, paladium, copper, nickel, tin, need I go on?
Sean, this is a good discussion. However, economics seems to be an illusion, an intentional overlay to cause angst, or loosh. I think the bailing wire is failing on the gabions, that we need to imagine a different world. I could use your help roughing through an idea that i believe can go viral, if played correctly.
If Q is a LARP - it doesn't matter, it has instigated thinking. Perhaps LARPs can be used to reevaluate the knowledge base in a weigh that measures reality, both with the five senses and beyond. I keyword my avatar handle as the lead on the posts. Let's talk. (not necessarily on air). doc
the first bank that crashes may be the one that starts to talk about corrupt customers.
the corrupt mobsters will use them as an example.
so no bank will dare to show their cold feet.
then most likely the smallest one will break first as something will have to give. unless the smallest bank is more extremely corrupt itself.
and that makes it even more unpretictible
Not a fan of her and have no idea how she became so popular in the past 6 months out of nowhere, but this was a pretty good interview
I'm curious to hear why you aren't a fan of L. Zhang. I see her data as invaluable, and her analyses seem spot on. Interbank lending seems pretty prophetic. I reckon raising interest rates is intended to trigger collapse, by making the deficits the US has been generating unpayable, and terminating interbank lending seems designed to augment this by promoting runs on banks.
I'd appreciate your thoughts. I do count on contrarian views, and yours seems to be one.
Thanks!
Agree.
Interbank is a great lakmus for health of financial system as a whole.
Debt has always been the ultimate evil control mechanism in society. I was always taught as a youngster never to get into debt. I use it very sparingly now. I think it was good advice.
People may think that they are living the high life living credit funded lifestyles, but it always has to be paid for one way or another.
I still don't get why Lynette is such a gold fan vs. silver. Every time that I hear her make a recommendation it appears to be gold. This makes no sense to me. Clearly (and for a hell of a lot of reasons) silver is a far greater opportunity. If gold takes off, it's impossible that silver won't take off as well.
I think Lynette and others like her use gold because of what it stands for. That is gold (and silver) in the basket of precious metals. Which could also include platnum and paladium BTW.
True, it could be. I just find it strange that she never really calls it out though. In addition, she also talks specifically about the gold she's buying and not silver.
Cheers mate...resteemed
I don't blame the banks for not trusting each other...I don't trust them either!! haha. For real tho, the current banking system has been sick and corrupt for a while now, for some reason most folks can't seem to see it. For a while I have been getting my metals and the strategy is HOLD HOLD HOLD. I will not sell it for crypto...nice try banksters. I suppose I'm 30 years away from retirement so I have time to wait for the manipulation to be over. That being said I also recognized the important role that crypto will have in the future and will gain in popularity. Holding some of both is probably a good strategy. It's just a matter of time until the current system falls apart and everyone rushes for the exit door both into metals and cryptos, anything they can get their hands on. The one thing I would like to point out, there is only so much physical supply of pm's available when that happens.
When the SHTF I think Gold will be a better asset to have instead of Cryptos. When you will have to go to your local supplier for whatever you will need at the time, most likely food, you will have a better chance at trading value with precious metals and a firm hand shake.
'Cryptos? What's a f-ing crypto? Look you want these tomato or not? Cause there are people behind you, so get out of the way.'
You'd be better off with useless dollars, at least he'll be able to start a five with them for his wood stove.
I agree with you 100% , metals will be more recognized at first, at the end of the day crypto is much like fiat, it's value is based on consumer confidence but reality is, there wont be enough metals to go around and ppl running for the exit doors will have to take whatever other currency is available. In the past, it was possible to put your money in a different country's economy because they didn't all falter at once but this time, all the economies are interdependent and they will all start to collapse one by one and all fiat systems will be dragged down. When it comes to international settlements traveling or making purchases abroad, a backpack full of gold or silver will be kind of inconvenient where that will also open the door for crypto currencies along with the permanent recording it provides. If adopted by governments it would also help protect against tax evasion scams because of it's transparency, the blockchain isn't as anonymous as everyone seems to think, it only is for the time being because it is ignored by governments for the most part. I could see a precious metal or other resource backed crypto currency becoming the new standard. At the end of the day, precious metals still win and will gain massive value if it ever comes to such a scenario.
The only disagrement is running out of Precious metals. After 5000 years we still have not run out. It will just be repriced accordingly.
we have not run out but in today's age there is less than 1 % of the population that hold, most of us holders have more than 1 oz and we will not give them up so easily. There will be enough to back a currency with it by increasing it's physical value for sure but there wont be enough for all of the population to trade with daily or convert their current cash holdings into it in a short period of time.
You need to get out of the mindset we have here today. We donnot have a free market system. In a truely free market it will be hard to run out of almost anything because the laws of supply and demand takes care of that. So in a free market you will not run out of gold it will simply be priced accordingly. You have silver, platnum, paladium, copper, nickel, tin, need I go on?
22:35 Lynette states she understands gold's "true functional value".
What is gold's true functional value?
Gold's true functional value is Money. That's the way I see what she is saying.
"True functional value" - If paper money becomes worthless, gold/silver coins will be exchanged for goods.
Yeah i agree with you.....great thinking...creative
She is one smart lady. I have heard her many times and always learn from her. Thanks so much!
Sean, this is a good discussion. However, economics seems to be an illusion, an intentional overlay to cause angst, or loosh. I think the bailing wire is failing on the gabions, that we need to imagine a different world. I could use your help roughing through an idea that i believe can go viral, if played correctly.
If Q is a LARP - it doesn't matter, it has instigated thinking. Perhaps LARPs can be used to reevaluate the knowledge base in a weigh that measures reality, both with the five senses and beyond. I keyword my avatar handle as the lead on the posts. Let's talk. (not necessarily on air). doc
the first bank that crashes may be the one that starts to talk about corrupt customers.
the corrupt mobsters will use them as an example.
so no bank will dare to show their cold feet.
then most likely the smallest one will break first as something will have to give. unless the smallest bank is more extremely corrupt itself.
and that makes it even more unpretictible
who has the most friends in high places