You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: ADSactly Education - On Capitalism

in #education6 years ago

Coming from a socialist democracy i'm quite an advocate for capitalism. It does get a bad rap as a system where greed is allowed to thrive, but so does socialism. People don't change their ways and perform actions in self interest regardless of what system they are in

While capitalism isn't a silver bullet that will solve all the worlds problems I do think it's a necessary evil and the benefits of capitalism are worth a lot more in the long term. Competition and innovation is allowed to thrive and intelligence is overly rewarded in this system

Capitalism also allows for less federal government intervention which is something im all for. As long as we're not generating monoploies and give people choice which is where regulations fail us in terms of aquistion and mergers, companies can quickly consolidate a market without consumers even knowing about it.

Captialists need to be less of a purist and adopt some regulations and idologies from socialism in order to improve the system

Sort:  

I agree with your assessment. There are several areas that could or should be more socialist in nature. Essential government services, for one, and I'm going to include basic health care in that mix.

If mergers can be allowed unchecked then we get into something that is no longer capitalist. Oligarchy maybe?

Thanks for a thought provoking comment.

Indeed the government is the price we pay for basic civil rights as a group! Roads, water, electricity, transport, health care etc in the ideal situation we pay a reasonable amount of tax for these services to be maintained they provide a platform for capitalism to thrive allowing barriers to be removed but also keeping them in check and avoiding like you mentioned oligarchy! We’ve yet to find a balance between the two because either one tries to dominate the other or the power of the one corrupts the other! Hopefully we eventually find a give and take balance that works for us

I do think though that systems like these will never work on large scales with millions and billions of people and that cities should have more autonomy to pick a system that works for its in habitants since they closer to the ground and know what will benefit people, creating sort of micro economies and governments with a bit of oversite on the federal level! This would help balance the spread and power of one system over the other as people who prefer one system could remain while others move creating a natural flow in and out of each system

This is why I enjoy steemit we can talk freely and discuss topics that on other mediums would be ignored or would turn into a screaming match!

I obviously do not know the answer, and consider myself lucky just to know some of the questions. I do believe that capitalism has a sort of 'self leveling' device built into it that will tend, over time, to moderate itself. For instance, right now, in the US I think that Capital has the upper hand over labor. I'm guessing (or maybe hoping) that will level out and labor will once again become 1/3 of the equation.

Thank you for the comments and the opportunity to trade opinions and ideas. I'm pretty fond of Steemit myself :)