The reason of the human being seeks to focus on the variable of what is possible; always responding to a point of the situations or attitudes experienced every day. Every time that logic is considered in man, it is believed that it is only part of a domain of philosophy, that is, that it has been dedicated to abstract and discursive processes of human thought, contributing to the creation of reasonings that allow us to conclude what particular of the universal and at the same time the universal of the particular. Now, if we conjugate the presented logic of philosophy with the mathematical sciences, we would enter into the point of knowledge that is required by man.
The reasoning that we must present in each event of the world and human development requires a mathematical analysis that allows the understanding of what is happening. Because, that reasoning presented in mathematics leaves aside "that" that was considered only for philosophers and gives input to the sets, propositions, among others that are part of every day in the sciences studied, which answer everything needy.
Now, if we study the logic of propositions we would understand that they are responses to statements presented that have a truth value, that is, this reason allows us to understand the values of truth in time, and can be presented as true or false. Which leads us to understand that in each situation there are two alternatives that will guide "the way" towards the truth, since, with them, absolute affirmation is sought or, on the contrary, denial.
This reasoning we believe is used by man's inertia and we do not see him involved in the mathematical sciences. However, through the use of grammatical arguments that seek an affirmation or denial, we find ourselves in the presence of logical points that produce a rationing of the response that leads to a proposition. Similarly, to understand these must recognize that they can be the product of deductions (conclusion of particular truths originated by universal truths).
That is why, it is stated that in every argument that is held as a man there is a proposition that gives rise to a numerical point for example if we establish a no, when it is assumed that it is a negation in the numerical science we are visualizing laws that have been based on foundations of daily experiments. Which shows that the nature of the human being is intrinsically linked with science?
In what does the logical application of propositions to man benefit?
As human beings, communication is vital, because by this means we transmit what we want our environment to know. However, some of what is transmitted are products of arguments supported by the thoughts of man, allowing him to recognize his behavior through it. Therefore, when logic is applied, we demonstrate the good of the bad in each expression of the language used, thereby consenting to the possible responses to be obtained by our environment. In addition, the logic of propositions encompasses a universal language structure in which we can inform despite our lack of understanding of the language itself.
Author @gersonbernal