Every human being at some instant of their existence is asked the question What is the origin of creation ?, The universe how it was created ?; it is possible that those questions were answered by science in one moment, through theories such as the Big Bang, which has been represented as the beginning of the universe through an initial explosion or explosion, considered as a physical enigma filled with a mystery.
However, if the Big Bang has been represented as the origin of physical existence, including that of space and time, how can we determine what has caused this? From a perspective more centered on the science of physics, it has been right that this was caused by the detonation of a "something" that in a certain way is a paradox. However, we must recognize that what caused the universe or genesis is a force controlled by nature itself; some scientists determined the existence of four natural forces, which control the world by the cosmic systematization that they possess.
From my perspective, the greatest force that can be observed is gravity, since the attraction that this force possesses allows us to analyze that the universe is an unimaginable power of cosmic spaces in paths and directions that evolve day by day. Many times we consider that the creation seen and analyzed by science is a domination of the same man, but analyzing each event that has occurred with the expansion of it, it must be considered that each argument held by scholars has been the product of comparative analyzes that argue all the genesis of creation.
Now, consider an example if the Big Bang took place product to an initial expansion and its explosive vigor did not have the magnitude of that moment, as we could be in this moment living; there enters the religious theories that indicate that everything has been the product of being superior. But does the paradox of genesis allow both theories? If we devote ourselves to deep investigations we would determine that this is a "something" of unattainable measurements for these generations, perhaps in some centuries discover and affirm through more truthful experiments the origin of this universe and why not of parallel universes.
Because the sciences have brought us closer to apparent cosmoses of "miracles" one of them could be considered galaxies as merely formal distributions similar to the same earth that provide "communications" among themselves for the expansion and functioning of the universes.
Let's conclude with a precise analysis ... the paradox of genesis is considered by theory as the Big Bang which to personal opinion has been a gift of superior beings "gods" or products of events without cause with an initial condition, which seek the deepening of the cosmos with surprisingly faithful events that try that the thought of this universe was created by that being that provided everything in an appropriate way from the beginning, for the obtaining of what he has wished.
Author @gersonbernal
You're either going to believe the scientific theory of creation or the religious one. And both require the exact same leap of faith.
Ultimately the universe (or more accurately its precursor) 'sprung' into existence. From nothingness, I guess.
OR
Ultimately god(s) sprung into existence. From nothingness, I guess. Which then went on to create the universe (or more accurately its precursor).
Now, if you like your metaphors, why not just consider 'god' and the universe and all its mysteries to be essentially the same thing?
HTH.
Ps. The thing that really keeps me up at night worrying is what's going to happen if we ever get to understand the true nature of creation (and all agree on it). I can't see how things could ever be the same again in such an eventuality.