I'm not offended at all by your opinion or anyone's opinion. It's the quick post using low credibility sources, presented as the whole story, that frustrates me. There was so much more to this story - about the test itself and about the group quoted at length in the story. I went to a lot of effort to really get a more balanced view of the information behind the story, from multiple sources. That's my issue, not your opinion, for sure.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ok, I checked multiple sources, all of which agreed with what I heard, and cited a few. I think there is always more to the story and wasn't trying be exhaustive, just to share my thoughts about what I had encountered.