You seem to be opposed to the research and development of technologies that could be or have been abused.
That approach would lead us back into caves because ALL technology can be abused.
I am opposed to the abuse of technology, not technology itself.
There is nothing wrong with mRNA technology per se - it was the spending billions of pubic funds and then forcing of a poorly tested experimental mRNA jab onto people that was wrong.
There is nothing wrong with researching brain-machine interfaces. There are many good uses of this technology. It is the potential for them to be abused to control people that needs to be carefully monitored. Although the mass manipulation of human psychology by Facebook etc has already had the same impact.
There is nothing wrong with robots either for the same reasons.
Technology can be used for good or evil.
I also don't abide by your "guilt by association" arguments.
Just because Musk has some business (out of hundreds) or social connections with Bill Gates does not mean they have the same agenda.
Its the same problem with saying that anyone who ever went to a WEF event or was named a YGL is automatically labelled as following the WEF agenda when very clearly their actions show the exact opposite. Musk and Putin are in this category.
The fact is that the WEF invited every prominent business and political leader.
Its the same with Epstein. Just about everyone prominent had some association. But its only those who actually fell for his traps and did illegal things with children that are guilty.
The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia adopted your arguments and murdered everyone prominent in their society and stunted technological development. This is where this attacks on all elites (rather than just the bad ones) leads.