the dams are literally, in our case, 1400 km away. No commercial fishing or water supply come from there. But the real question is: compare to what? Coal, windmill, natural gas?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
the dams are literally, in our case, 1400 km away. No commercial fishing or water supply come from there. But the real question is: compare to what? Coal, windmill, natural gas?
Not comparing to anything here. Just merely pointing out that "anyone who may be experience bad effect should we sweat over a few fish and some change in the soil?" is a myopic view in ecology and biodiversity loss.
Alternative energy can always be sourced due to human knowledge advancement. It is reversible.
An ecosystem when affected, or even biodiversity loss, can be IRREVERSIBLE.