you know in my own opinion, it's hard to answer correctly this kind of proposal about palm tree plantation. Because we already know many can benifits for this. It will help many people have work and also it will help the oil need's to everyone. It's hard for me to give an opinion because I have my own.
but please don't take my word's in an offensive way.
The reason of this destroying our nature are the rich people. They became so greedy, they knew that people want's to have more money. They sacrificed humanity for their own. The buyer or us the user, we use resources abundantly even though we don't need much.
But actually no one has to blame alone for this. It's all of us, if we limit ourselves by using resources the big companies won't keep on supplying bigger amount of resources.
that's my insight, I hope I'm making sense for this. hehe
Posted using Partiko Android
There is never a simple answer. What benefits one can harm another.
I recently read something which pointed out that with the reforestation projects we have happening, the overall global tree coverage had increased in recent years. It would be interesting to know how much of that is monoculture. With the palm oil plantations, the jungle had been replaced with trees, still, but biodiversity has been lost.
I believe multiple approaches are the best solution to most things.
Posted using Partiko Android