You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Does Freedom Require Radical Transparency or Radical Privacy?

in #eos7 years ago

Yeah the movie qua movie wasn't great. But through it I could sort of see the issues Dave Eggers probably was trying to raise in his book. I appreciated it philosophically if not cinematically.

There's an undercurrent of inevitability I think running beneath Dan's whole argument. He's sort of saying that, due to human nature, privacy is impossible: the question is who do we prefer being spied by.

Like I said in my reply to Dana above, I think people are quite willing, even eager, to spill the beans. They're desperate to get noticed. I think this, again, is due to our ancient nature as it evolved in small groups, where we were known and respected by every single member of the tribe. Whereas now, the tribe is global, and we're painfully aware that we don't exist for most people. Hence the appeal of fame. People don't wanna hide. They want to be their own Truman Show, with the whole world watching, being witness to every triviality of their life, Kim Kardashian Show-style.

Sort:  

Thats only because people are getting rich doing it. I don't think people actually desire it as much as you make it out.

People are presented the upside of fame by the media but the downside is hidden until a person truly becomes famous and figures out their life is ruined.