Thank you Thierry for your comprehensive explanation. As regards the coma, scenario, we should not forget, that 3.1 years of coma is, or maybe someone lost in the jungle is a veeeeery rare event, and offchain you are likely declared dead anyway after such long period of times. I think in such scenarios the heirs can easily claim the funds via arbitration, just like with other assets.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi @tsto, @conceptskip
Thank you for this brilliant and amazing reply @tsto! :)
Im very sorry for such a delay with my replies but currently Ive been overwhelmed with amount of work that has been related to my latest contest. I never expected to receive such an amazing support.
Thank you for sharing your view. Just wanted to let you know that finally I had a chance to read your comment. Appreciate your time.
I actually agree with you tsto. I've been thinking about coma or other accidents. What if something happend to me and I will end up in hospital for 1 year and last transaction I did on EOS was 2,5 year ago.
Why @conceptskip would you assume that coma/some tragedy would have to happend only right after your last transaction?
What if you had accident and lost your memory ? What EOS came up with us just wrong and will put off many potential investors.
Enjoy your weekend :)
Yours
Piotr
Hi @crypto.piotr, thanks for your valuable addition, it's a good point you bring up, with your example. The new constitution proposal, which is likely to succeed, will remove that paragraph entirely. Yet I think it would be worthwhile to deal with inactive accounts, maybe bye only renting out their resources until reclaimed.