I was thinking that it was a little high and that it could possibly stifle any attempt to launch a blockchain, but the more I read what has been posted in the comments here and the resources linked to, the more I'm beginning to agree with you. 🙂
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Most investors in EOS tokens are incentivized to acknowledge at least 1 chain. The terms and conditions are pretty clear on what happens when no chain is successfully launched: tokens would be worthless and completely useless.
But you wouldn't want thousands of EOS chains either, that just about anyone can start one, it would destruct the forming of robust ecosystems with dapps.
Absolutely.
Allowing for multiple "official" EOS blockchains while protecting against unlimited, uncontroled use. That's pretty much the conclusion I've come to on this. Would you say that's a fair summary?