Who is supposed to be loyal to Steem and BTS? If you mean Dan Larimer he is only one member of the Block.one team. Everyone working on EOS has an obligation to act in the best interest of EOS itself and not act in the interests of former projects.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Feel free to feel however you want, so will I :)
I don't mean to be antagonisitc. The EOS ICO is odd in my opinion, but accusing developers of disloyalty to their past projects is also extreme.
Is it extreme to see a developing pattern? BTS get's left with no devs and while I can use it, most average users look at it and just scratch their heads or mess up and send funds to the wrong wallets etc. Steem is finally gaining traction and while we have extremely fast block times and huge transactions numbers, what could possibly motivate someone to leave the platform they designed to go and make their primary competitor stronger? The only thing I can imagine is money or power, but who knows, time will tell.
Perhaps the strategy is to become a sort of activist investor. If Block.one holds enough ether from their ICO they can have some say in the decisions made by the ethereum community.