Great post. I'm liking the EOS communities vigilance about BPs even in the very earliest stages. Congrats to starteosiobp for no longer being the slowest BP. I know a lot of people have been pointing out their terrible (relatively) avg. CPU time/tx so I'm assuming they listened and upgraded their hardware.
Also, thanks for pointing out in the post that tx speed isn't the only metric that people should look for in voting fir BPs. While it should definitely be an important metric since tx times help the network improve, there are also qualitative points to consider. For example, cypherglass was in the bottom four, but they've done so much for incubation, outreach, education, partnerships, etc. They should definitely be recognized and compensated for their efforts. Hopefully they will use the BP rewards to upgrade the equipment to lower the tx speeds. They would then be an unstoppable force.
Thanks again for the post 👍
Thanks, https://steemit.com/@michaeldharris
You might also enjoy
https://steemit.com/eos/@johnchamberlain/eos-governance-from-ecaf-to-the-alliance-with-eyes-on-the-wps