Let's be fair. You can't link the source code and call that research. I'm more than fully aware of it being open source on the GitHub, but you cannot verify the server is running that version.
Nor can pretty much any normal user gather any information from the source code. Advanced user and all that doesn't touch on the level of experience required to verify source code.
You can hope more experienced users have done so, but that was why I was asking (not accusing) if you have done research to provide with the claims that the source code is somehow vulnerability free (there is likely very little code that is truly vulnerability free).
Not picking a fight, just saying that MyEtherWallet has done some shady practices in the past. It is good to have how to articles though so your main post is of course valuable.
Edit: oh i see your edit now. Congratulations on the internet gloating I guess on your super numbers for helping others invest in an ICO that had every single necessary instruction on their own website right alongside the information I would have advised likely investors to read. Take care bud.
This is crypto, do your own research. Trust no one.
Not gloating, I am outlining that I have been in telegram helping people for over a week, several hours a day, and that includes with parity, as well. You tell me I'm gloating, but you're the one draining the reward pool with voting bots
You're rather antagonistic for someone who isn't picking a fight.
@good-karma, could you be more selective with those you give power please?
You are ridiculous. Lmao.
Just quit telling people software you don't posess the ability to vet is vulnerability free.
Bold text doesn't make it more scary
Btw I see you flagged my comment. If you are just salty j flagged yours, you should know you got flagged for tagging another unrelated user simply because I'm posting via esteem. What is your reasoning for flagging besides just wanting "revenge
No revenge, you're a hostile Steemian and thus, devalue the network. Because of this, I flagged your hostile comments. You could have expressed yourself in a more healthy manner, but chose not to. As a hostile commentator, the author of esteem should probably be aware of who they are sponsoring with votes. But ultimately, it's up to @good-karma who he would like representing esteem. On the other side, I upvoted one of your posts I enjoyed, even though it's no longer in the reward period. That is my form of revenge.
Go thru the comments and see which individual is offering up insults. I'll wait.
Feel free to edit them out if you'd prefer.
Maybe you can self vote to counteract the effect.
I couldn't find a single insult.
Yeah, there's some insults in there. Well deserved ones, too.
... You're a waste of time. Maybe contribute something for once, instead of spending so much time bringing people down. It will probably work out better for you.
Actually I do, but it's not my responsibility to do so. Nor do I have time. You're welcome to however! And I'll even link to it, even though you interact like a petulant child.
And I never told them it was vulnerability free nor was it implied. I asked them to DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH TO MAKE SURE A WALLET IS VULNERABILITY FREE
You should probably stop looking for things that aren't there.
Ok we are done here since you just want to argue. But your implication of that comment while recommending people use MEW is that it is "void of vulnerabilities"
You're the one who is argumentative, not to mention antagonistic and arrogant. There's no implication. The emphasis of that sentence is Always do plenty of research on a wallet before you drop a private key into it. I've progressively clarified based on your feedback, hopefully it appeases you. Thanks for bringing it to my attention that it wasn't clear enough.