You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: EncrYPtIOn is fUtIlE - Debunking the Cult of John McAfee

in #esteem5 years ago

I'm a little surprised that anyone expected him to really eat his member, but the response to not eating it wasn't very surprising. This seems to be just part of his tactics to hype things and get public reaction for a desired outcome. To go on and say it was a ruse for adoption, knowing full well that it is the "model T" of blockchain tech, is a full on admission to dishonest tactics.

I guess the question is, what is the associated ruse to this "MITM isn't a thing", thing..? If there is a ruse at all, it's a bit hard to come to any solid conclusions here in my mind.

I learned a great deal about AES reading your analysis here regarding brute force attacks, and how it would take 6 million years to crack. It would have only been a guess for me, and if asked to guess, it wouldn't have been 6 million years. This is a pretty impressive number.

If Moore's law is still applicable today, (which I'm not so sure it is) and this current analysis is from 2012, then maybe it's about 1.5 million years with current tech? I'm not a professional in this field and I'm not even sure if Moore's law is applicable to this, but I'm guessing you probably know. Just something that came to mind while reading.

The Quantum computer topic regarding encryption is pretty interesting too. I watched some laborious videos on Quantum computers during a brief time when I was super tin foil hatting and thought maybe we were going to bring some crazy entities out of another dimension (who knows!) , and I'm just going off memory here, but I think these guys were saying an efficient Quantum computer could crack our best encryption inside of an hour, even minutes potentially.

If this is the case, (and It's hard to doubt Quantum physicists in their field..) it seems logical to assume that this tech will remain black-boxed until Quantum level solution for encryption becomes available. Negligence would mean severe economic issues, likely collapse, and we have enough issues in that area as it is.

The HSM's sound awesome. I've never heard of them before this post, and that is a truly remarkable idea you have. Hopefully you'll get some qualified people interested to assist in a project with you.

There are plenty of good practices that even non security professionals can employ to protect their sensitive information, and the less one spends time considering the implications not doing a little research and learning what they can do, the less surprised they should be in the event that something happens. DERPCOIN, definitely.. One example is Steem password. I always tell people, there is no need to store this on an internet connected device, you shouldn't be logging in with it, get it off your computer, put it somewhere, and forget about it unless you need it later.

Ok, this is getting a bit long. Congrats on your certification, and thanks for the shout out!

Sort:  

On the Moore's law, I think it most assuredly would pertain to this. Considering we have figures for both 2012 and 2018, I suppose we could use those data points to make a crude estimate as to where we would be years from now.

The implications of quantum computers is not something terribly savvy to but I do recollect that instead of circuits existing in the on/off state that there are something 4 distinct states. Does that mean 4x processing power? I'm not sure but it would be a fascinating topic to explore further.

I don't happen to have a calculator and it's been a terribly long time since I operated one but I'm trying to find an online tools so maybe we can get a visualization. I may be able to pull it off with Python MatPlotLib but gonna shelf that for now.

Thanks for the thought provoking comment!

I'm not sure the math can be calculated in the same manner. Here is an interesting read. Qubits being 1's, 0's, or both at the same time, and superpostioned particles defying binary constraints, will make for some interesting calculations. Have fun ;)



that gif is good :D

Funny right? 😂 I thought it kind of fits in with the conversation.

Ok, this is getting a bit long.

That's probably what Peter Schiff was thinking when it came time to save his seed words! 😂

bad um tsss