I might be a fan or I might not. Or anything between and you will never know.
On the other hand your post calls "try EOS" on multiple places (I have nothing against EOS and Im invested in it). That leads me to a slight suspicion you might be biased.
I still dont see the advocation. He said "I can argue" not "I believe or I think".
Look, I can argue Vitalik is a child porn advocate or that he runs Eth. in a very uncetralized way and I can agree or disagree with that. The point is I can argue the other side too.
Did you ever try to argue the opposite side of the topic even if you didnt agree with it? Can I argue just for the sake of argument without being marked as an advocate of that thing? .....if not, "bravo" to free speech.
I apologise for my harsh first comment.
I always look at both sides of the argument, and in this case he is just flat out wrong for saying what he did and I am calling him out on it.
Your first comment wasn't too harsh, it was spot on. The twisting of what was actually tweeted to what titusfrost is claiming it means is ridiculous.
How did I twist what he said? Please explain that? @blocktrades?
Just read the top comment on your post by @rapshmelth, it summarized my thoughts pretty well...