It's simple, there is a double standard. It is "ok" for @transisto and Bernie to rape the reward pool the way they see fit, including voting their comments on the last couple days and voting their sock accounts, but it's not "ok" for others to do what they do. The hypocrisy by those two in particular, as well as some of the larger accounts on here, blows my mind. Until steemit.inc changes the code, everyone should be free to vote their own stake as they see fit. It's what is going to happen anyways and heck, it might even encourage steemit.inc to act faster.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's not on Steemit to change the code, it should be on you to ask the witness you vote for to do it.
I'm not personally worried with reward pool rape as much as I am with public perception of the top trending content.
Interesting. So, you would have no problem if @haejin were to make exactly the same amount, but instead voted his posts at the 3 day mark so none of them showed up on trending?
Exactly, It would be much less of a problem.
That is interesting and maybe something some of these whales can come to an understanding on. What do you say @haejin?
Is it more important for you to have 8 posts on trending every day, potentially scaring off new users (no offense)? Or is it more important to maximize your earning power each day?
It sounds like you can possibly have something close to that second one without getting too much flack from at least some of the other whales.
If Adsactly were agree to this as well, we could have a vastly different trending page without affecting their earnings too much...
That satisfies @transisto but NOT the trolls.
I have no control over when these upvoters vote!
Tell me of ONE popular steemit blogger who asked all his upvoters to hold for 3 days! NONE! Nor will I!
Yes, my 2,900 MV witness votes currently support your recommended witness. IF there is no help from you, I will seek other witnesses.
By the way, WHY are you downvoting my blogs?